|
||||
|
ATTENTION: WinkWorld Readers RE: BOUNCE-BACKS - Check your "Junk" settings. It is normal for school districts to have internet filters which block unknown messages. In addition, teachers often give us only their .edu email. Because of this, we receive bounce-backs from many teachers, who then wonder why they are not receiving this newsletter. I try to find/contact each person who has a bounce-back, but I have limited success. Please contact news@joanwink.com if you would like to supply a 2nd email address. |
WinkWorld April 2007
Hello Friends, This month in WinkWorld, I am sharing a few interesting sites/thoughts, which have emerged in class this past month. Enjoy.
Reading Recovery
Socratic Dialogue Poverty and Prosperity After reading about what teachers make in the last two WinkWorld, Debra Schneider, a former MA student, shared the following high school social studies unit. Enjoy! Debra writes: The last edition of WinkWorld, with the piece about "what teachers make" made me think that WinkWorld readers might be interested in how my colleague, Tom O'Hara, and I look into those same issues with our 11th gradeUS history students in Central California. This is part of our fourth quarter unit (we teach history thematically, not strictly chronologically) theme: Poverty and Prosperity in the 20th Century. I know when we developed these lessons, this information really opened my eyes.Our unit question is, "What can we do about poverty?" We begin by having students define poverty as they see it and write and talk in small groups about what they see as the causes of poverty. Then we show them this matrix of wages (which we update every year or so) and it opens their eyes: what welfare really is and how much it pays, how much minimum wage jobs really pay (they learned this year that the latest increase, though welcome, did not necessarily lift workers out of poverty), and what it means to be "the working poor" (since to many of them, "poor people don't work" and are "just lazy"). http://www.joanwink.com/newsletter/2007/wagematrix2007.pdf They understand the power of education to address poverty, so then we show them what people make by education and gender (another shocker for many girls!). We also show them how many people actually make it to and through college, and work with them to list the skills and knowledge they need to be developing now to be the one(s) who do make it through. And we show them why it pays to stay in high school, with this piece from my former colleague, Sarah Dias.
http://www.joanwink.com/newsletter/2007/incomebysexanded2004.pdf
Also helpful is
Debra Schneider, Ph.D In addition, I refer you to: Krashen, S. (2005, February). The "decline" of reading in American, poverty and access to books, and the use of comics in encouraging reading. Teachers College Record. Retrieved March 28, 2007, from http://blackboard.csustan.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab=courses&url=/bin/common/course.pl?course_id=_4101_1
More on Poverty
Recommendations for NCLB
The Political Context of Gingrich's remarks Gingrich's attack on bilingual education should be understood in the context of Republican presidential politics. Both he and Mitt Romney hope they can exploit the issue to win over Far Right voters, whose loyalties are up for grabs. The good news: Gingrich has a short attention span. He pushed an English-only bill through the House back in 1996, but when it brought no political benefits for Republicans he dropped the issue. A year later, discussing two-way bilingual ed, he told a reporter for the New Yorker: "Do you realize that there are two hundred languages spoken in the Chicago school system? That's an asset, not a liability. You get Sally to speak Cambodian and Sally gets you to speak English. If they succeed, we give each of them a thousand dollars. We'd have kids practicing language seven days a week." [Quoted in my book At War with Diversity, 2000]. Steve Krashen's comments on Gingrich. Sent to USA Today, Posted on Washington Post website, April 1 Re: Gingrich critical of bilingual education (April 1) Newt Gingrich is wrong and Peter Zamora is right: Bilingual education does a better job of helping children acquire English than English "immersion." Bilingual programs use the child's first language in ways that accelerate English language development. In the last two years, four major reviews (including one from the US government) have been published confirming that children in bilingual programs do better on tests of English reading than those in all-English programs, including one report from the US government. Stephen Krashen
The four major reviews:
New Angel: Buttercup, My Horse
Notes from the Real World
Family Update
Pink and White M&M's
My March Medical Tests
Adam's Poem
I Never Cried
To follow Adam's progress,
Family Pixs
1-Dawn and the Kids |
web maintenance |
||
|
To Reference This Web Page:
© Copyright 2001 - Joan Wink, All Rights Reserved |
||||